Sunday, November 16, 2008

Tenuous Oath?

At one point I was skeptical about whether or not all of the women would keep to their promise. For one,the women were extremely reluctant to partake in Lysistrata's plan in the first place, and made it apparent that sex meant a great deal to them. Kleonike states: "Try something else. Try anything. If you say so, I'm willing to walk through fire barefoot. But not to give up SEX-there's nothing like it, Lysistrata!" (26). It is obvious that the women treasure sex, not only the men. Also, I felt that the way the oath was sworn was doubtful as it was altered at the last minute from a shield to a recommendation of wine, which I felt made the oath more tenuous.

Peace

The ending of Lysistrata was extremely interesting to me although I was confused by some parts. I enjoyed the way Lysistrata used Peace the woman as a map for the men to divide land upon. I found it humorous and creative on Lysistrata's part. I don't understand, however, the men's ability to divide up the land as easily as they did with so much built up sexual tension/lust. Because of this I believe that Peace was simply used to keep the men amused while Lysistrata further convinced them to sign the treaty. After this however, the men became more serious because land was at stake...something possibly more important to them than their current sexual desires. Also, I found Talor's comment that Peace was turned into an object interesting.

Applying Lysistrata to Modern Affairs

Lysistrata was obviously accomplished in the pursuit of her ultimate goal of peace through abstinence. When applied to the current war in Iraq however, I do not believe the plan would have been successful. The war in Iraq covers a broad spectrum of men from various parts of the country. Whereas in Lysistrata, the Peloponnesian War is situated in Greece and the men at war are much fewer. Lysistrata is the dominant woman in control and does a superb job at leading the women. However, in our time, it would be difficult to control so many women many of which would most likely be unwilling to participate. Also, in today's war, it would be easy for a man to obtain sex from another source. The entire idea I believe would only serve to promote violence and more of a class between men and women rather than bring about any sort of peace whatsoever.

Diction

The diction of the characters is an important aspect of the play. However, I find it difficult to fully assess the diction seeing as we are reading the play and unable to actually hear the voices. Despite this drawback though, we can assume certain dialects from the way the character's speech is written. Lampito's dialogue for example, is written as if it is spoken in a stereotypical Southern accent. Although it may seen unimportant, this dialect contributes greatly to Lampito's character. As representative of the Spartan women, Lampito's accent depicts these women as dim-witted and ignorant. On the other hand, Lysistrata has a diction which seems to demand respect. Her lexicon combined with her enunciation and perfect delivery place her in a position of authority and one which involves the careful consideration of the men, something seemingly incapable of women during this time. Overall the diction is fundamental to the development of characters and, although we cannot actually hear the language, we can work with what we know from what is presented in the text.

Puns

The puns presented throughout Lysistrata were extremely interesting to me and added comic relief to the otherwise dramatic situations presented throughout the play and involving the two sexes. I am aware that the content of our English translation is basic compared to that of the actual Greek plays and other translations. It is said that Americans are unable to handle the crudeness of the original Greek plays and that it would be extremely offensive however I believe that I would find it interesting and more humorous to read the harsher version. I am curious to know what controversy, if any, would be provoked if these plays were to be translated and produced with the full effect of their original puns. However, it was difficult for me to catch most of the puns and many of them had to be explained to me before I fully realized them; others, were fairly obvious. My personal favorite pun involves the interaction between Myrhhine and Kinesias during which Myrhhine is constantly returning to the Akropolis for items apparently meant to comfort Kinesias provoking Kiniseas to state, "What a lovefeast! Only the table gets laid".

Costumes

While reading Lysistrata, it was somewhat interesting to me to imagine what the costumes for this production were like. While reading, I was disappointed to find little reference to the costumes. There are some points where the women's clothing is described as well as the garments of both the Koryphaios and the Choruses. However, these scenes leave little room for interpretation and are more a part of the general idea of the separation of man and woman (for example, the tunics between the two choruses). A scene which I enjoyed involved the veil of Lysistrata. While Lysistrata is attempting to explain her plan for the Treasury to the Commissioner, he states he cannot listen to a woman wearing a veil. At this point, Lysistrata removes her veil and places it on the Commissioner. As the veil is the garment of a woman it is comical to see it on a man. This action on the part of Lysistrata demonstrates the veil as the women's sign of inferiority. Another reference to clothing is in the description of the women's attire. The garments and the lingerie described and discussed between the women demonstrates how they are in-tune with their feminity. One woman in particular who is excited about her feminine garments in Kleonike. It is as if the garments for the women represent their ability to express themselves and their feminine nature. For women like Kleonike, the garments are exciting to the women as it allows them to excite their men and show off their bodies. These two references to the characters' costumes proved most interesting to me. 

The Wool Metaphor

In Lysistrata, the metaphor which I found to be most interesting was Lysistrata's wool metaphor described to the Commissioner. On page 62 Lysistrata continues her wool metaphor in which she compares wool to Athens as a whole city; a united body of citizens rather than separated. Lysistrata believes the whole city should be cleansed of burs. In this metaphor, the burs represent the bad men and corruption which plague the city. The imperfections in the wool represent the imperfections in society. The removal of the "knots and snarls to snag important posts" (63) is Aristophanes reference/criticism of the politicians in Athens who conspire in order to get each other elected. Lysistrata announces who would be and would not acceptable in her city. Among the accepted include: loyal "Resident Aliens, All Foreigners of proven and tested friendship, and any Disenfranchised Debtors". Lysistrata believes that the collection of these people with create a stronger, renewed Athenian civilazation. To Lysistrata, these people represent the wool which she believes will encompass and embrace all of the various people loyal to Athens. During this metaphor, Lysistrata's voice is heard to the end, uninterrupted by the men. This passage clearly symbolizes one of the main voices of Artistophanes in which he believes women have a place in society and a right to fight for what they believe in.